|
|
|
|
|
by ahilanv
617 days ago
|
|
Thanks for your insights! I just wanted to clarify a few points about how the system works, as I think there may have been some misunderstanding. Everything in FortLock is decentralized: Server A and Server B store hashed parts of the password, not the password itself, and they’re tied together via the Levelpoint stored on Server C. No single server has access to enough information to reconstruct the full password.
The Levelpoint is an additional layer of security, ensuring that even if one server is compromised, it’s useless without the other two.
We’ve also implemented several precautionary steps across these servers to ensure security, including encryption and independent infrastructures for each.
The intention behind using this decentralized approach was to reduce the risk of having a single point of failure. I understand that there are other state-of-the-art methods like public key cryptography and hardware enclaves, and I’m exploring those further as I continue developing this system. I really appreciate your feedback—it helps me refine my approach and stay grounded in what's proven. I’ll definitely take this into account as I work to improve FortLock. Thanks again for taking the time to comment! Best, |
|