[llm_trw]

>Could you elaborate please ?

No.

I've tried explaining this to supposedly smart people in both a 15 minute pitch deck and a research paper and unless they were inclined to think it from the start no amount of proof has managed to convince them.

I figure it's just not possible to convince people, even with the proof in front of them, of how powerful the system is. The same way that we still have people arguing _right now_ that all LLMs are just auto complete on steroids.

[Veen]

Prove how powerful "the system" is by doing something useful or value-generating with it. Then people will believe you. Talk is cheap.

[llm_trw]

>Prove how useful LLMs are by doing something useful or value-generating with them. Then people will believe you. Talk is cheap.

You after chat GPT2 was released.

[dboreham]

> people arguing _right now_ that all LLMs are just auto complete on steroids.

Funny because when I learned about how LLMS worked my immediate thought was "Oh, humans are just LLMs on steroids". So auto complete on steroids squared.

[ValentinA23]

I'm inclined to think it from the start

[llm_trw]

If you care enough you can email me at [e-mail] I'd be happy to talk more in a less public setting.