Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sevg 613 days ago
No, not quite. XDG-compliant programs end up storing stuff in one or more of the following places:

~/.cache and ~/.config and ~/.local/share and ~/.local/state and ~/.local/bin

I used to get annoyed by non-compliance to XDG. Now I wonder if I'd actually prefer apps to reverse the hierarchy (eg, ~/.apps/nvim/{cache,config,state}).
2 comments
ants_everywhere 613 days ago
I find it obnoxious when apps make me hunt for all of their cache directories. Just put all the cache data in one place.

Make it clear what needs to be backed up, what is ephemeral, and so on. Just put everything in ~/.cache. Chromium in particular is bad at this and has many types of cache.

link
tracker1 613 days ago
That's where I would probably split myself... ~/.cache/appname for cache data, and ~/.???/appname/* for everything else.

This is a huge part of why I like docker-compose and docker in general, I can put everything I need to backup in a set of volume maps next to each other.

link
nat 613 days ago
I would definitely prefer this. I've never wanted to see the "cache" stores for all (XDG-compliant) apps, but often want to see everything for a single app.
link
eadmund 613 days ago
It’s less about wanting to see all the caches, and more about excluding all the caches, e.g. from backups. Likewise, there is one directory for machine-independent configuration which you might share, and another for machine-specific state (such as window positions).

Is the spec perfect? No, of course not. But is it thoughtful, and does it address genuine needs? Yes, certainly.

link
jasonjayr 613 days ago
It also enables you do things like:

a) store caches & libdata on different disk

b) consistently 'reset' cached data for kiosk style logins

c) make config read-only, or reset to a known good state

d) Roaming profiles where the cache is excluded from sync across machines

Most computers + home directories are 'personal' where this largly doesn't matter, but there are often sound operational reasons for this seperation in cases where you are responsible for a fleet of computers. I too perfer the 'everything related to this app in one dir' approach. Crazy idea: for apps adhering to XDG, you could point all these vars at a directory under a FUSE-style mount, which then remaps the storage any way you'd like. :)

link