more specifically, Apple is Apple for shutting down apps that usurp their markets. But don't worry - Apple won't be Apple for much longer, and it has given up on all premium differentiation by being idiots.
This time it's different. This time it's failing by deciding to act as much as a beige undifferentiated manufacturer as possible. If you like I can send you a complete analysis.
Seeing as I completely and totally reject your conclusion on a fundamental level, I would like to see the analysis.
Apple has remained sexy in the face of mainstream, a feat that I'm incredibly impressed by.
Say what you will but many, many people still buy iPhones today because of the allure of it -- and if what you had said was true (that Apple was acting as as a beige undifferentiated manufacturer) than the exact opposite would be true. People wouldn't find Apple's products alluring any more.
Seems to me that the only people who don't find Apple's products alluring today are the same ones who never have -- and Apple gives as many shits about them today as they did a decade ago (none).
Notice how unlike Android phones, they don't introduce NEW phones at cheap price points? How they use old models for free and cheap models?
This is intentional -- users understand that free and cheap go along with old, and users don't mistake their old/cheap device for the new hotness.
Now, with Android, the effect you're describing happens 100%: People buy brand-new Android phones that are free/cheap and get disappointed "but I thought it was an Android, I thought it was better than iPhone" or something.
I think Apple's maneuver here is deft, because you won't see a 3GS owner claiming they have the new hotness, but you will see them still coveting the new hotness (which is 100% the point).
That's some hilarious armchair analysis. Got any polls, statistics or.... anything... to back that up?
Or just stereotypical Apple-is-going-to-fail bs that people have parroted for the past two decades straight?