[neilv]

> It's incredibly dangerous of these "journalists". Putting targets on people's back [...] The actual leading candidate is [named other individual/family target]

Am I misunderstanding something, or do you want to edit that?

[mepian]

That person is already dead, and already widely discussed (including here on HN a few days ago) as a candidate.

[adastra22]

The person being dead just means their surviving family and heirs are the target instead. It's irresponsible to finger anyone as Satoshi.

[benterix]

> The person being dead just means their surviving family and heirs are the target instead.

Which logically makes little sense TBH in this case in particular, but yeah thugs might not be particularly reasonable.