[PhasmaFelis]

The thing in this particular case, as you know, is that we have a very obviously biased Supreme Court making decisions based on what's good for the corporations paying them, instead of either settled precedent or the intentions of the original legislators.

The intended checks having failed, they're allowed to do this. You're old enough to know that "allowed to" does not automatically mean "morally right."

EDIT: Actually, let's bottom-line it: Stop pretending that pointing out any flaws in a democratic government is anti-democratic. That's exactly backwards.