[lcnPylGDnU4H9OF]

> Congress used to update laws regularly, but those times are over. It can't legislate effectively anymore.

This is defeatist, and misses the point. Congress should continue to update laws regularly and the SC decision provides an impetus for them to start doing so. Congress mandating the regulation also has the effect of Congress determining the scope of legislation. With Chevron, there's no reason for them to update laws because they just let, e.g., the EPA make up the scope of the laws themselves. (Why people will claim "overreach".)

The scenario this enabled is a new presidential administration would be elected who would fire the old regulatory leadership and hire their own, effectively allowing the executive branch to re-write the law every 4-8 years. There was a lot of opinion thrown around about how the SC decision is a power grab for the judicial branch and I just don't see it. They took power away from the executive and gave it back to the legislative, where it had been before Congress became useless.

Whether or not one agrees with this approach is worth considering, but man, talk about comments that demonstrate the author has "no idea what Chevron was about".

[light_hue_1]

Wow. Your viewpoint is that Congress doesn't work so we should give it more to do?

Ok. Well I have nothing to say to that. Enjoy your pollution, diseases and shortned lifespan!

[lcnPylGDnU4H9OF]

What a bad faith take. I recommend taking another pass at the comment and trying to get a more respectable understanding. You’ll never find common ground with others by adopting such a shitty attitude.