[trh0awayman]

If you hire using LeetCode, you will surround yourself with people who enjoy blogging about LeetCode in their free time.

LeetCode was never about LeetCode, it was always a stand in for culture.

It's now a signal for baseline compliance. That's generally good for companies that require mostly operationalists.

The problem is that anyone can learn to leetcode. If you're interested in doing something new and not just warehousing CS lawyers, you're gonna have to ask better questions than that.

[drewcoo]

> The problem is that anyone can learn to leetcode. If you're interested in doing something new and not just warehousing CS lawyers, you're gonna have to ask better questions than that.

I think the problem is that everyone thinks they can ask better questions and almost none of those people are qualified to judge their interviewing competency or have data to back themselves up. Every company has its own special interview techniques that it's convinced will lead to the best possible outcomes when those only demonstrably lead to the current staffing. To question any of that means pointing fingers at pretty much everyone and that's a political non-starter.

[beaconify]

Leetcode is often one or two rounds. You also get tested for culture and design interviews. This is not ideal but hard to see how FAANGs are gonna do it. I guess FAANGs need operationalists though except for their research arms. Dynamodb works well. Your job is to make it work 0.01% better to save a few mill.