|
|
|
|
|
|
by pphysch
614 days ago
|
|
|
I strongly disagree. This is an excellent application for JSONB. The user outlined that the records are for historical compliance purposes and therefore aren't frequently updated after the initial phase. A schema of `party1 JSONB, party2 JSONB, ...`, or even `parties JSONB` would likely be far more maintainable and sensible than the "table-as-spreadsheet" approach. |
|
|