[johnobrien1010]

The approach is fundamentally flawed. You can’t query an LLM as to whether it has a theory of mind. You need to analyze how its internal logic works.

Imagine the opposite result had occurred, and the LLM had outputted something which was considered a theory of mind… Does that prove it has one, or that it was trained on some data that had something it used which made it sound like it has a theory of mind?