|
The Senate report that's referenced [1] is clear on the matter: they didn't give her anything. Immediately after the quoted part, this follows: "The petitioner desires the donation to her of a small tract of land by
Congress. With every feeling of respect and kindness for the memorialist, a majority of the committee deem it impossible for this Government to
make the grant. They think such a grant without a precedent, and that
it would violate the spirit of those compacts by which the public domain
was ceded to this Government. It is the unanimous and anxious desire
of the committee that the petitioner should receive all the benefits and recognition that this Government can bestow. What this Government cannot do is within the power of the American people. They feel at least an
equal pride and glory with us in the name of America. Throughout our
wide extended country, among all classes, this feeling is universal; and
in the humblest cottage the poorest American feels that this name, the name
of his beloved country, is a prouder title than any that adorns the monarch’s brow, and that if he has no other property, this name, with all its
great and glorious associations with the past and hopes for the future, is an
all-sufficient heritage to transmit to his children. This generous, patriotic,
and enlightened people will take into their own hands the case of America Vespucci. They will procure for her that home which she desires
among us. They will do ail that Congress is forbidden to do, and infinitely more than she asks or desires, and demonstrate to the world that the
name of America, our country’s name, is dear to us all, and shall be honored, respected, and cherished in the person of the interesting exile from whose ancestor we derive the great and glorious title." [1] S. Doc. No. 264, 25th Cong., 3rd Sess. (1839) https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/SERIALSET-00341_00_00-01... |
I, personally, read into those final lines that she was, indeed, given land, but from private donors.