No, it's a reference to the fact that USB-C is really a meta-protocol, which can (and is) implemented in many different ways by manufacturers - and thanks to variation in power handling, it also carries the odd chance of frying your devices!
... Isn't progress wonderful?
(Jk, it's so much better than USB-A. But the wtf moments are real)
... Isn't progress wonderful?
(Jk, it's so much better than USB-A. But the wtf moments are real)