|
|
|
|
|
by jcgrillo
628 days ago
|
|
You still have to manually review and understand every single line of code and your dependencies. To do otherwise is software malpractice. You are responsible for every single thing your computers do in production, so act like it. The argument that developers can all somehow produce 10x or more the lines of code by leaning on a LLM falls over in the face of code review. I'd say at most you'll get 2x, but even that's pushing it. I personally will reject pull requests if I ask the author a question about how something works and they can't answer it. Thankfully, this hasn't happened (yet). If you have an engineering culture at your company of rubber-stamp reviews, or no reviews at all, change that culture or go somewhere better. |
|