[xiaodai]

I don’t know. I find quanta articles very high noise. It’s always hyping something

[jll29]

I don't find the language of the article full of "hype"; they describe the history of different forms of imputation from single to multiple to ML-based.

The table is particularly useful as it describes what the article is all about in a way that can stick to students' minds. I'm very grateful for QuantaMagazine for its popular science reporting.

[billfruit]

The Quanta articles usually have a gossipy style and are very low information density.

[SAI_Peregrinus]

They're usually more science history than science. Who did what, when, and a basic ovnrview of why it's important.

[vouaobrasil]

I agree with that. I skip the Quanta magazine articles, mainly because the titles seem to be a little to hyped for my taste and don't represent the content as well as they should.

[xiaodai]

Same. I think it does disservice to math.

[amelius]

Yes, typically a short conversation with an LLM gives me more info and understanding of a topic than reading a Quanta article.

[MiddleMan5]

Curious, what sites would you recommend?