[spookie]

All artists I have known have spent most of their lives practicing. Just as I have practiced programming.

That's the biggest edge, commitment.

To think that you _need_ to be neurodivergent to be an artist is non-sensical and stating mastering the craft itself is worthless is indicative of a lack of respect for their work.

I'm baffled by this type of comment here in all honesty. Really, broaden your horizons.

[psychoslave]

Certainly, life-long commitment to some discipline is not something that is in the middle of the bell curve.

I don’t know if neurodivergence might have any overlap, but I wouldn’t be surprise that a study reveals it to be as correlated as the fact that most rich people were born in wealthy families.

[consteval]

> To think that you _need_ to be neurodivergent to be an artist

You will notice I never said this.

All I said, and is true, is there is a correlation between being an artist and being neurodivergent.

> stating mastering the craft itself is worthless

Where did I say this too?

It appears you're having an argument with a ghost. You're correct, that argument is baffling! I wonder then why you made it up if you're just gonna get baffled by it? Seems like a waste of time, no?

Look, art is two things: perspective and skill. One without the other is worthless.

I can have near perfect skill and recreate amazing works of art. And I will get nowhere. Or, I can have a unique and profound perspective but no skill, and then nobody will be able to decipher my perspective!

[spookie]

I'm sorry if I misunderstood, but please clarify how this two quotes don't align with what I said?

> But mastering this alone is almost worthless.

> And it's magic because then it must not be rationale and it must not make sense, because the neurotypical can't see it.

Not trying to take them out of context, but specifying them. You mention, from my understanding, that mastering is almost worthless without the magic, and the magic only being there if you're neurodivergent.

This implies one cannot be a proper artist if not neurodivergent. Now, I could be misinterpreting it, so I apologize in advance.

[consteval]

I never said the magic is "only" there if you're neurodivergent, I said it seems to me neurodivergent people seem to be more likely to have the magic.

> There's a huge overlap between creatives and mental illness

Keyword overlap, but I don't think it's 100%

Magic is maybe not the right word here, but I do think it's indescribable. It's some sort of perspective.

But I stand by this: > that mastering is almost worthless without the magic

How, exactly, you obtain the magic is kind of unknown. But I do think you need it. Because skill alone is just not worth much outside of economics. You can make great corporate art, but you're not gonna be a great artist.

I think if you're perfectly rationally minded, you're going to struggle a lot to find that magic. I shouldn't say it's impossible, but I think it's close to.

[spookie]

Fair, I think the "magic" depends on other factors that may or may not lead to neurodivergence. Those being:

- Life experience

- Exposure/education when young

Of course, these might lead to neurodivergence or might not. The key thing is that the magic is a very unique, personal thing. Human, one can say. Also, through practice you come to understand new perspectives, something that is perhaps lessened in your view.

Either way, I've missunderstood your take to a degree, and had a much more radical interpretation of it.

[hackable_sand]

You spent your life in *your* lane. Why don't you stay there and keep committing.

We'll be over here trying new things, making new art, and expanding the horizon bye