|
|
|
|
|
|
by rbc
617 days ago
|
|
|
I've become a fairly loyal OpenBSD user in the last 3-4 years. The base OpenBSD load includes a substantial amount of network capabilities, and is cleanly implemented. It's almost too cleanly implemented, to the point of making me feel sort of guilty when I start to clutter up an install with a bunch of packages... If my needs for storage were more complicated, I would probably use FreeBSD ZFS, but UFS suffices for my rather modest needs. I use OpenBSD for desktop, web and mail services. There are some limitations, but none that are serious enough to warrant dealing with running another BSD, or Linux distribution. |
|
|