|
|
|
|
|
by soup10
616 days ago
|
|
Ok, but in my mind it's a lot like a mystery box, there's a lot of speculation about what's in the box, but without new instruments or new observation techniques, if the light/information from inside isn't reaching us we'll probably not be able to prove what's going on in the box one way or the other. One can claim "space-time breaks inside the mystery box" all you want, but I haven't heard of any testable theories. |
|
Because if we just accept that, what do we do then? We just sit and wait for some new astronomical observation to give us a clue? that could take forever, and we'd be banking that we have the tech to observe this magic hint.
Better to suppose that the theories we have comprise an accurate approximation or partial model of reality, and from there strive to find a better model.
The process of doing so will either refine/entrench our current model and our conviction, or it will result in actually finding a better model. Win-win, and all the while, we can still have our telescopes and detectors on for the magic hint we'd be sat waiting for anyway.
When things break down into singularities, it can be a pretty good indicator that we've got something wrong. Not necessarily, but in this case, I think we missed something.