[lmm]

> In what universe does the UK have grounds to have anything to do with governing a region 6000 miles away from home that it seized during the Opium War?

A universe that respects the right of the people who live somewhere to chose the government they want? We've all seen the protestors waving British flags there.

Abolishing the right of conquest in the early 20th century was one of the great achievements of humanity, and that is not diminished by the impossibility of making it retroactive.

> If you think they aren't sufficiently butthurt about it, I'd counter that by saying "what can they realistically do about it?" The answer is "absolutely nothing." You want them to invade or something?

> They can write a nastygram or something but any of the promises involved with the transfer really mean nothing.

There's a whole spectrum of diplomatic measures the UK could do short of all-out war. Trade restrictions. Hell, full diplomatic recognition of Taiwan is a great option.

[dangus]

We’ve seen protestors in all kinds of countries wave all kinds of flags. We all know pragmatically that that’s not how governments are chosen.

The fact that the situation is unfair to HK citizens doesn’t have much relation to the fact that there’s no legitimate reason for the UK to have any involvement at this point in time, unless you’re just plain and simple in favor of imperialism.

In that case you’d be making the argument that people who more closely align with China who live in North Dakota are allowed to just vote and declare North Dakota to be a Chinese province.

There’s a whole spectrum of diplomatic measures that the UK can do that make zero difference in the situation.

Trade restrictions? The UK fully depends on Chinese imports. It would hurt the UK more than China.

Recognition of Taiwan? What would that change? Western countries already defacto recognize Taiwan and work with them as a close ally. This would be changing vocabulary on some documents and plaques.

[lmm]

> In that case you’d be making the argument that people who more closely align with China who live in North Dakota are allowed to just vote and declare North Dakota to be a Chinese province.

If a majority of legitimate citizens, the people who've lived their whole lives there and made the place what it is, want to join China (and China is willing to accept them), of course they should be allowed to do that. Do you not believe in self-determination? And if you don't believe in self-determination then how can you even object to imperialism in the first place?

> It would hurt the UK more than China.

The second world war hurt the UK more than Germany. But there was a time when the country's integrity was worth something.

> Recognition of Taiwan? What would that change? Western countries already defacto recognize Taiwan and work with them as a close ally. This would be changing vocabulary on some documents and plaques.

Sure, but it's documents and plaques that China apparently cares deeply about.