[antiterra]

First, saying it's completely useless is complete hyperbole. You can enter to do items through an application or web interface. That is a use. It may not be a novel use or a use that interests you in any way, but it's still a use. It's a disappointing fact, but the truth is that command line integration, scripting or a public API are not particularly mainstream features in an app.

Next, it would seem pretty fanatical to say "this app does everything I want to, but because the features weren't there in the first version, I refuse to use it." If the new functionality is well-integrated and not simply shoe-horned in, would does the first version of the product have any relevance at all?

[sophacles]

Well a team that decides to build a clone of something that exists hundreds of times over, without thinking to even mention that more features are on the way, probably doesn't have the ability properly add features in the future. They show a complete lack of thought towards innovation or product usefulness, only the ability to poorly copy something. Therefore I'm not going to waste my time following them, and instead give attention to one of the other 100 todo apps that shows the potential for actually becoming useful to me.