[zamadatix]

You seem more focused in being "right" about votes (in this comment, in the other comment, in your profile comment...) than actually engaging the conversations themselves. [1] is about whether they have a strong moat, that's orthogonal to whether those people thought ChatGPT was the dominant product.

I'd agree being the current best, having a lot of revenue, and being the popular origin of generic terms like "GPT" are indeed great examples of being dominant though. Having "a strong moat" means having reasons 5 other companies won't be able to do the same thing in the next 5-10 years and overtake them. History has shown, plenty of times, just being the big brand OG player at the start doesn't provide a big moat in and of itself. If that were the case you'd be talking about how some other company like Google is the dominant player in all things AI right now.