|
|
|
|
|
|
by gaganyaan
632 days ago
|
|
|
I actually had pretty good results from taking a new language that was posted here and having GPT-4 try to interpret it. I don't remember what it was called, but it was APL-like, very symbol-dense, but not using standard symbols. It was too new to be included in any training data at the time, but GPT-4 did a good job of figuring out what each symbol meant. I think it's not impossible for LLMs to write code like you're wanting. Maybe it's actually harder to redefine common idioms, but to be fair that happens with people too: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stroop_effect |
|
|