[rahimnathwani]

Here in San Francisco:

- Our tax dollars fund government-run schools that cost an $26k per student per year. Fewer than half the students at those schools meet or exceed grade standards for Math and English.

- The median cost of a religious school is about half the cost of government-run schools: https://x.com/RahimNathwani/status/1840965145604079997

- Parents who choose to send their children to non-government-run schools get no vouchers: we pay taxes to fund government employees, and then use what's left to pay for the schools our children need.

[sharkjacobs]

I'm not from San Francisco, I don't have a horse in this race, I was just looking over the link that you posted and it doesn't seem to support what you're saying at all

- The link you posted doesn't talk about public schools at all, only private school tuition.

- This 2024 census.gov report[1] says that San Francisco public schools cost $23,654 per student

- According to graph on the link that you posted only 12% of private schools in San Francisco charge < $25000 annual tuition

- According to the article from the link you posted religious schools make up 48% of private schools in California, so mathematically, at least 3/4 religious schools charge more in annual tuition than a year of public school costs (according to census.gov)

- According to the article from the link you posted, religious schools offer special lower rates for families who belong to the parish, meaning the "cost per student" is even higher than tuition

[1] https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024/public-s...

[rahimnathwani]

  > The link you posted doesn't talk about public schools at all, only private school tuition.

Yes, that was to show the cost of religious schools which is the type GP was talking about. I did not provide a source for the $26k cost of public schools.

  > According to graph on the link that you posted only 12%
  > of private schools in San Francisco charge < $25000
  > annual tuition

Yes, the charts on the bottom half of that graph show tuition for parochial (religious) schools, which was GP's topic. Ignore the top half (non-religious) as it's not relevant to this discussion.

The median sticker price for parochial schools in San Francisco is:

Grades K-12: $10.9k

Grade 3: $10.4k

Grade 8: $10.9k

Grade 12: $27.0k

All of the above are calculated by weighting each school equally, as I don't have access to per-school per-grade student counts. Feel free to recalculate these. They're based solely on the data the SF Chronicle intern collected.

  > This 2024 census.gov report[1] says that San Francisco
  > public schools cost $23,654 per student

Well, that 2024 report is based on old data from 2022. That's two years old! Let's look at more recent data.

SFUSD's operating budget for 2024-2025 is $1.3 billion (https://www.sfusd.edu/about-sfusd/sfusd-news/press-releases/...).

It has 48,000 students (https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/sfusd-closures-b...).

That's $27k per student per year, which is more than it was the last time I looked!

  > According to the article from the link you posted,
  > religious schools offer special lower rates for families
  > who belong to the parish, meaning the "cost per student"
  > is even higher than tuition

I don't have extensive data to back this up, but from anecdotes I've heard it's swings and roundabouts. Some families pay more than sticker price, and others pay less.

[sharkjacobs]

Yeah you're right, sorry for making you write that all out, I should have stopped after "I'm not from San Francisco and don't have a horse in this race"

[rahimnathwani]

No worries. You took the time to think and dig a little, so I don't mind being more specific. Anyway, whatever questions/doubts you had/have, I'm sure you aren't/weren't alone :)

[ZeroGravitas]

Are those other schools half the cost because they exclude anyone with disabilities or poor upbringings and just cream off the easy students?

If so then you are enthusiastically cheering for kids to be thrown on the scrapheap to save you a few bucks. And using religion as a cover for it, which only makes it worse.

[rahimnathwani]

No. They're half the cost because they don't spend half their money paying for a central bureaucracy. They spend almost all their money on buildings and teachers.

[drawkward]

1). You can lead a horse to books, but you cant make it think.

2). This statistic is meaningless unless without data about the inputs and outputs. I assume that that student populations are vastly different.

3). That's your choice. In Ohio, I get to fund religious education, which I am vehemently opposed to doing.

Have you considered that, perhaps if you and like-minded parents didn't remove their students from the public education system, perhaps the test scores would be higher?

[rahimnathwani]

  Have you considered that, perhaps if you and like-minded parents didn't remove their students from the public education system, perhaps the test scores would be higher?

I didn't 'remove' my child from the public education system.

Government schools in my area are not an attractive option. I spoke with the principal of one of the top 3 most popular elementary government schools (measured by ratio of applicants to kindergarten spots). She made it clear that, if my son were to attend that school:

- my son would never be allowed to skip a grade

- under no circumstances would a teacher in grade X teach material normally covered in grade X+1

My son is in 3rd grade, doing math with the 4th grade class, and studying 5th grade math at home.

If he were at a government-run school, he would be in 2nd grade, and spend math lessons at school covering material he mastered 2 years ago.

  In Ohio, I get to fund religious education, which I am vehemently opposed to doing.

In San Francisco, I get to fund an inefficient bureaucracy set up to benefit adult employees, which I am vehemently opposed to doing.

SFUSD has 1 adult employee for every 3.5 students. A minority of those adults are classroom teachers. Average class sizes are not 3.5, or 7, or even 14.