|
|
|
|
|
|
by jprete
625 days ago
|
|
|
I'm not a physicist but as soon as I saw it I thought that it would be very costly (in physicist time) to distinguish it from a real physics paper. The difference between this and the output of a physics crank may well just be how fast they can produce it. |
|
|
For someone working in the are it should be fast. It's too far away from my are to skim and find the errors.
Anyway, the default for a preprint (or paper) in the trash bin. Unless it's recommended by someone I thrust or it's published in a serious journal, I'd just ignore it.
For a post in HN, I can take a 10 minute look and try to find something interesting to comment about it good or bad. But not more than 10 minutes unless there is good reason.