[Gehinnn]

I was referring to the press release article. I also looked at the paper now, and to me their presented proof looked more like a technicality than a new insight.

If it's not solvable in polynomial time, how did nature solve it in a couple of million years?

[tptacek]

Probably by not modeling it as a discrete computational problem? Either way: the logic of the paper is not the logic of the summary of the press release you provided.