[quotemstr]

Yes, but in the vast majority of cases the interpreter is ld-linux.so (or the Buonic/Musl equivalent) and a safe binary inspection tool can know for sure what that interpreter will do. It's okay for that tool to say "I don't know" 0.0001% of the time.

[ReleaseCandidat]

It wasn't meant as an argument against not loading the interpreter, but an explanation why it is "normal" - but if course insecure - behavior for ldd to execute the configured interpreter.