|
|
|
|
|
|
by YeGoblynQueenne
634 days ago
|
|
|
>> I agree 100% with this sentiment, but, it also is a decent description of individual humans. Why would that be a good thing? The big thing with computers is that they are reliable in ways that humans simply can't ever be. Why is it suddenly a success to make them just as unreliable as humans? |
|
|
If we are evaluating LLM suitability for tasks typically performed by humans, we should judge them by the same standards we judge humans. That means it's OK to make mistakes sometimes.