|
|
|
|
|
|
by seec
626 days ago
|
|
|
So, it's better to potentially completely ruin the life of an innocent instead of killing him.
From a humanity standpoint the first option is much more barbaric. Besides, what is the chance an innocent gets out if he was convicted in the first place? I believe it's so low that the mistake is not giving a decent out (and avoiding large costs to society) to problematic peoples on the off chance that you might get an innocent released 10 years earlier.
If he was truly innocent, his life is ruined already, he would have to live with the consequences for the rest of his life... |
|
|
Yes clearly it's better. Killing him definitely ruins his life as well and isn't reversible.