|
|
|
|
|
by gradientsrneat
632 days ago
|
|
Microsoft got around this in some of their agreements by adding provisions to "throttle" arbitration so that if a lot of customers file arbitration at once, they may have to wait months or years to have their case heard. Binding Arbitration was already a blatant sidestepping of the American Constitution and general corporate accountability, but leave it to Microsoft, a monopolist with government contracts, to take it to another level. The only binding arbitration agreement I've seen which compared was Linode's, which included a gag clause. |
|
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/14/business/disney-plus-wrongful...
They backed away from it but they tried.