[Spivak]

Who is the mythical non-echo-chamber informative challenging news source?

[janalsncm]

propublica.org is pretty good.

[carlosjobim]

They wrote that these things can be found in paid sources.

[dingnuts]

I had a subscription to the Wall Street Journal for awhile and while I can't say that's what the GP is referring to, it absolutely sounds like the kind of deluded crap a WSJ subscriber would say to justify spending $40/mo on that crap to themselves :D

[alexandre_m]

That would be an aggregator, like allsides.com

[tensor]

I think "non-echo chamber content" is only valuable as long as all of it is similarly high quality. In my opinion, reading diverse but low quality content (e.g. filled with misinformation, a lack of concrete information, and a lack of sensible reasoning) is not helpful.