|
|
|
|
|
|
by mthoms
631 days ago
|
|
|
Do I need to spell it out? The foundation is headed by the same person who they granted an exclusive license to. Not just a commercial license to use the trademarks. It's permission to sub-license the trademarks for profit without restriction. It's blatant self-dealing. It's an obvious conflict of interest for a foundation that is supposed to be serving the community. |
|
|