[alasdair_]

>It should be able to learn how to drive a car just as fast as a human does.

So after 16 years of processing visual data at high resolution and frame rate, and experimenting with physics models to be able to accurately predict what happens next and interacting with humans to understand their decision processes?

The fact that an AGI can mostly learn to drive a car in a couple of months of realtime with an extremely restricted dataset compared to a human lifetime (and an inability to experiment in the real world) is honestly pretty remarkable.

[kaba0]

I mean, you get pretty good results with a dumb-ass logic of “if right wall is closer than this, go left” and the reverse. Like, a robot vacuum is 95% there where a tesla is. And a tesla is 80% where a human is. It’s just that last n percent requires a full on, almost AGI with a proper model of the physical world.