[tivert]

> Your post seems like an example of what GP is talking about.

No it isn't. The GP accused the flaggers of flagging it for ideological reasons, because it goes "counter to their narrative." I'm saying that it's legitmate to flag because it's been posted using the wrong url, because awareness of the true source and knowledge of its biases is useful for evaluating the content.

[lbhdc]

>But to argue this is almost always futile because all most people seem able to absorb is that you're disagreeing with their intuitively compassionate position

[tivert]

What's your point, and what does that have to do with the specific url that's used in the post?