Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jayd16 630 days ago
The Magic Leap headset already uses essentially an LCD layer to add per pixel shading to add darkness.

Even still, modern displays are so so good that an additive display is a massive step down.

1 comments

Hard edged, per-pixel light blocking is impossible for the foreseeable future. What's possible today, and what Magic Leap has, is diffuse dimming of large areas of the display.

The problem with light blocking is that when the blocker is millimeters from your eye it is completely out of focus. Unlike for the display, you can't use optics to make it appear farther away and in focus because the direction of the light it needs to attenuate can't be modified (or else your view of the world through the glasses would be warped).

For a near-eye light blocker to work, it would need to be a true holographic element which can selectively block incoming light based not just on its position but also its direction. Each pixel would essentially be an independent display unto itself that selectively blocks or passes incoming light based on its direction, instead of indiscriminately like a normal LCD. I have no idea how such a thing could ever be fabricated.

True, but sharp edges are much more of a nice to have than any dimming at all. The magic leap dimming goes a long way.

Forcing the industry to redesign visuals for additive displays is a huge uphill battle.

That's fair but what if you could estimate the direction of incoming light with other sensors? Using inverse diffraction etc. Just a thought
I'm not sure what you mean. Light is coming in from all directions simultaneously.
Sorry never mind! I wasn't thinking at all when I wrote that thought, but that obviously doesn't make sense :)