|
|
|
|
|
by Chris2048
638 days ago
|
|
> a lot of newer ones seem to have odd pricing. as in, they cost as much as freeholds, despite being leaseholds,
That scam has yet to become apparent, but I'm sure it will eventually. Also, the liability of having to depend on a management company, and rising fees.. |
|
I thought grenfell pushed the leaseholder vs freehold pricing out in the open. I've seen stuff about leaseholders effectively in negative equity because of the cost of cladding and a previous government dropped a bill or amendment changing who had to pay for such things or the existence of leasehold.