[jackTheBuilder]

Medicare + Medicaid has been prohibited from assisting negotiation of drug price between pharmacy + drug company for a few decades. That is set to change in the future id my understanding.

I have private health care insurance so my insurance company would try negotiate the price down.

I agree with other commenters saying basically, drug companies all around the world do R&D, are happy to sell drugs at cost in England or Somalia, but will aim to make money in US selling drugs with a healthy profit margin here.

[JumpCrisscross]

> Medicare + Medicaid has been prohibited from assisting negotiation of drug price between pharmacy + drug company for a few decades. That is set to change in the future id my understanding

It’s already started [1].

[1] https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/29/politics/medicare-drug-price-...

[howard941]

Slowstarted

[ywvcbk]

> so my insurance company would try negotiate the price down.

Do they have any incentives to do that though? If their profits are fixed at a specific % wouldn’t they be incentivized to spend as much as possible so that they could increase premiums (as long as all other companies play along)?

[1123581321]

If premiums are too high, employers will switch the insurance company they offer employees.

[triceratops]

To whom? Everyone will do the same because everyone's incentives are the same.

[1123581321]

You’re talking about something theoretical. I’m telling you what actually happens.

Insurance companies lose business when their premiums are unnecessarily high. In the long run, all their prices go up, but those who manage rising costs better (and provide better service and all that other stuff), grow their businesses.

[triceratops]

I think you're being theoretical. Insurers can only increase profits by inflating medical costs.

"Insurers are supposed to spend 80% of every dollar on care and only 20% on administrative costs. However, instead of lowering premiums, the insurance companies have been incentivized to increase costs so that they can make more money."

https://penncapital-star.com/uncategorized/americans-suffer-...

[1123581321]

I am not sure what else to tell you. Companies switch insurance providers for cost all the time. I've benefitted from it several times and seen first-hand how competitive the selection/sales process can be. If an insurer thought they could coast on high prices, losing accounts would change their behavior quickly, like in any company.

As an industry, insurers all benefit from aggregate rising medical costs because of the percentage rule you mentioned, but that's not the same as what an individual insurer will do.

If you're arguing as a proxy for wanting public health to be allowed to enter the industry as a price negotiator, I'm in complete agreement.

[nradov]

There's nothing theoretical about price competition. Large self-insured employers and other group buyers are very price sensitive. If a company offered Aetna health plans to their employees this year they would happily switch to Humana next year to save a few dollars. There are sophisticated analytics tools available now which let those customers predict future costs under various options.

[JumpCrisscross]

> To whom?

Themselves. Plenty of companies hold the risk and outsource administration.

[ZeroGravitas]

In the article the drug maker suggestss that rather than negotiate the price down, US insurers stop buying the drug if he cuts the price too low.

That seems like a wild claim to make, but since it's just reported as if that was normal rather than a shocking scandal, I guess it's probably true.

[whaleofatw2022]

It's part of the grift. Expensive drugs means all sorts of middle men negotiate concessions to make themselves get better performance reviews.