[kelnos]

> Personally, I think the “highly” in your statement is quite over exaggerated.

Except that the entire point of the article here is that it's not exaggerated.

> But at the same time, science landed humans on the moon.

Cherry-picking a highly successful, well-known example doesn't prove a point.

[Tainnor]

> Cherry-picking a highly successful, well-known example doesn't prove a point.

There must be hundreds, if not thousands, of successful scientific discoveries that went into something as complicated as the moon landing, and if you still don't think that's convincing, just look at the world around you - which looks just radically different from the world of, say, just a couple hundred years ago.

[consteval]

> Cherry-picking

As if our lifespans and quality of life haven't been drastically improved by modern medicine.

I mean, we can cut people open and replace entire parts of them and they're fine. They don't even get sick anymore - thanks germ theory and aseptic technique! Do you not understand how much of a marvel that is?

Before that, people used to get cuts and scratches and just... die. We can now fully rummage inside an arbitrary person's internal organs.

And don't even get me started on long-term illnesses. High blood pressure and cholesterol has been killing humans since forever, and we have medicine that just fixes that. And now, we're getting medicine to rewire our brains to prevent addiction in the first place (semaglutide)