Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by krick 640 days ago
Every time someone brings up Signal in these threads I cringe. One can make up stories about spam protection as much as he wants, but given how little (basically none) control one has over him phone number, no messenger strictly requiring a phone number can be considered "privacy-oriented" by any sane person.
3 comments

What do you advocate for an alternative identifier and how do you combat spam without verifying a phone number?
no IDs, only connect to the users you choose to connect with

SimpleX comes to mind

https://simplex.chat/

Huh?

I think you are confusing "privacy-oriented" and anonymous! Signal is pretty privacy oriented since it has E2EE by default (and so does Whatsapp). Telegram would be much more privacy oriented if it had E2EE by default.

they have usernames now
You still can’t create an account without a phone number