[anotherhue]

This is happening because competition amongst browsers is so low. Fund your favorite alternative to solve the problem for good.

Servo would be the most ironic.

[InkCanon]

I'd also blame it on Mitchell Baker. She was a lawyer whose main contribution to Mozilla was writing it's license. After she was laid off from Netscape, she kept falling upwards in Mozilla until she was CEO. And even flush with dubious corporate money, she gutted engineering teams while more than 10x her salary until it reached 7 million.

[1oooqooq]

no this is happening because any project that succeed (e.g. Mozilla) is corrupted to the core by goggle's money.

brave haven't even for off the ground and is already dealing with them

what we need is decent leadership. not million dollar salary presidents. maybe if emacs had a seat at w3c :)

[im3w1l]

The reason they take the money is because they need the money.

The reason they need the money is because they need so many employees.

The reason they need so many employees is because it takes so much work to implement a modern web browser.

The reason it takes so much work to implement a modern web browser is because the web has sprawling Living Standards. And users expect not just correctness but highly optimized jit.

[1oooqooq]

for Mozilla thats not correct. and i think you know it but might have skin in the game?

if honestly misguided, go ahead and take a look on where Mozilla waste money. it's hard to parse on their reports but it's all there.

then see how much goes into actual browser vs how much they got by donations and revenue of the fund. the fat is not the browser.

also they would still be getting user donation if they didn't go full dark side and burned that bridge.

[im3w1l]

If it's hard to parse why don't you tell me? How does their budget break down?