|
|
|
|
|
|
by radford-neal
642 days ago
|
|
|
I don't know what political machinations go on in the International Energy Agency, but one has to wonder why they thought it was useful to define a term "renewable" in this way, considering that such a term is of no use in formulating any rational energy policy. Could it be that it lets some companies get subsidies targeted at "renewable" energy, which sound good to the voters, without also providing such subsidies to nuclear power? |
|
|