Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ldjkfkdsjnv 639 days ago
dont have time to find it. he basically says the 2% thing is an antiquated understanding that conflicts with recent ancient dna studies. Go watch the podcast

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj6skZIxPuI

2 comments

I can track down the studies he’s criticising. A Google search doesn’t show up anything refuting those. What are the studies he’s citing?
Watched it. He didn't present _any_ sources supporting his claims. There's nothing there.
Publishing a ton of research on this would basically be a career ending move
Ok, you're almost there. Why would it be career ending?