|
|
|
|
|
by throwaway2016a
641 days ago
|
|
To be fair I wasn't agreeing with the "API in 20 minutes approach" I was only pointing out the contrast between that and something like this. As I tried to allude too, AI written APIs often have security, performance, maintainability and a whole slew of other issues. But at the same time, I think "blank video on your phone for 20 minutes" is a bit of a stretch. These AI generated APIs have problems for certain but they are working software and in many cases better working software than a non-coder or junior engineer could have written in a much longer time. And while I don't like the idea of tons of insecure poorly architected APIs being out there, the realty is, people are using AI generated APIs in the real-world right now, it's not hypothetical. |
|
What is "working" software?
Have we lost the meaning of that now too? Samsung Galaxy Note 7 is a "working phone" too - it just might explode.
> but they are working software and in many cases better working software than a non-coder or junior engineer could have written in a much longer time.
Imagine the nurse telling you that you've got an AI doctor operating on you that's better than the junior surgeon. I'm sure you'd be happy. We've been cheapening the industry for a long time. Not everyone needs to produce code.
> the realty is, people are using AI generated APIs in the real-world right now, it's not hypothetical.
The reality is there is contaminated cooking oil [1], noodles with opium [2] and a infinite amount of issues. Let's not make the world worse?
[1]: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-07-13/cooking-oil-contamina...
[2]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/09/2...