[throwaway2016a]

> OK Moonwalk has a great vision, but how do we actually make it a real spec?

I'm not sure the article really succeeds if that was the goal. I suspect that there might be some aspects of the discussion that are taking place that are missing from the article making it a little difficult for someone who wasn't in those discussions to connect the dots.

Don't get me wrong, I think the article had some useful pieces in it, I just think if that was the goal of the article it could possibly use some additional framing for people who don't have the full context.

With that said, I really appreciate transparency into the thought process!

[handrews]

> I just think if that was the goal of the article it could possibly use some additional framing for people who don't have the full context.

It's always a struggle to figure out how much explanation to put in before people see something like "20 minute read" and just refuse to read it. (BTW I don't mind the critical feedback at all- I'm just glad you found something useful in it).

But keep in mind that _we_ haven't answered "how do we actually make it a real spec?" either! This is a snapshot of our efforts at this particular moment. Also, there's a reason that this is "part one in a series" :-)