[learc83]

Just because it happens doesn't mean it's right. Yes companies drag out payment and make you jump through hoops to get paid (the you here is a hypothetical freelancer).

The reason they do this is to hold on to your money as long as possible with the outside hope that you'll just go away and they get away with theft.

It's bad enough with larger companies where the people you're working with may not actually be the people who are writing the checks, but at a small company like this it is unacceptable.

Assuming the story is true, the CEO agreed to pay then decided that she didn't want to pay anymore. To accomplish this she's doing her best to get the designer to give up and go away.

How is this acceptable behavior? Again I realize it's common, but it's flat out dishonorable.

[capsule_toy]

I like how you assumed malice when bureaucracy is a much more plausible explanation.

[learc83]

I acknowledge that bureaucracy might be partly to blame in larger companies, but we are talking about a small company where the designer was dealing directly with the CEO.

[tptacek]

Again: are you familiar with the concept of "payment terms"? Has anything been disclosed to suggest that this vendor hasn't had timely payment? Are we all clear on what "timely" means in the context of freelancing?