[ficho]

+1. I've lived in the city for 5 years and found all places but the last on CL (last was CL through padmapper). If you manage to get a good workflow you can find little gems in less than a week.

That's the beauty of its UI, the fact that's it's not so appealing puts some people off but also rewards those working hard at it. The amount and variety of offered appartements on CL is huge and much better than what most other sites would offer. That makes for an experience whose reward can be very high and this is valuable when looking for a place to live.

[crazygringo]

> the fact that's it's not so appealing puts some people off but also rewards those working hard at it

Right... why would you want to only reward your users who work hard? That's idiotic.

Why wouldn't you want to make the site easy to use, with high-quality data, for everyone? When that really wouldn't be that hard to do.

When I was apartment-hunting, over the course of weeks, I literally learned how to recognize particularly spammy brokers by the formatting of their headlines, so I wouldn't click on them... (Four asterisks at beginning and end? Ignore. All-caps with a strange abbreviation for bedroom? Ignore. Etc.) This is a skill I deeply wish I hadn't had to learn. It's ridiculous.

[ficho]

it is and its not. the question you're putting fwd in the end is that of a fully transparent market or not. With cl as it is, the market for broker apts, new ones etc is fairly transparent as these are listing you'll often find on all rental sites.

The market for shares / sublets / by owners is much less transparent and in a city as NY where some places are rent controlled, other have a an amazing history / layout etc, this is actually interesting.

In a sense it gives anyone a shot at being lucky and finding an amazing place with a bit of dedication. If it was fully transparent I think the challenge to achieve the same outcome would be to continuously for long periods of time, be looking for an apt. Which right now isnt necessary.

That's it. Nevertheless I'd be curious to see this done right and see the difference.

[crazygringo]

> In a sense it gives anyone a shot at being lucky and finding an amazing place with a bit of dedication.

What you're describing is basically anti-market. You're saying, celebrate market friction and inefficiences, so people who are time-rich but money-poor can have a shot at finding underpriced properties, kind of like a lottery.

For me, it just means that I wasted probably 20 or 30 hours of my life sifting through listings that were 99% crappy, in order to find my apartment. I blame Craig, for not improving the efficiency of the market, which would be really easy for his site to do.