Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mewpmewp2 640 days ago
On the other side of the argument, does $2000 a year seem a lot for high-availability?

Does downtime really cost only $100 per day? How was it calculated? How much does your business make? It would seem it should make more than 365 * $100 = $36,500 to be able to be in a position to hire people in the first place.

Database downtime would potentially:

1) Break trust with customers.

2) Take away focus from your engs for a day or more which is also a cost. If an eng costs $200 per day for example, and you have 4 engs involved with, it's already a cost of $800, not to mention increase of odds of stress and burn out. And in US engs would cost of course much more than that, I was just picking a more favourable sum.

3) If it's a database that breaks, it's likely to cause further damages due to issues with data which might take indefinite time to fix.

Overall in most businesses it would seem a no brainer to pay $2000 a year to have high availability and avoid any odds of a database breaking. It's very little compared to what you pay your engineers.

1 comments

The whole thing is a side project with 5 customers total. If it dies it'll take a while before anyone notices.
It's a side project but you are calling them coworkers and a company with company's goals?