[Cheer2171]

> at times leave her texts virtually meaning-free.

This statement makes no sense. What is the methodology these reviewers used such that they can determine how much meaning is in a text? And what is the difference between a text that is "virtually" meaning-free and 100% meaning-free with no modifier? What is the threshold for a text to have an epsilon of meaning? I'm sure those reviews came with p-values.

I might say that those reviewers' understanding of continental philosophy is questionable and at times leave their texts virtually meaning-free.