|
|
|
|
|
by wpietri
636 days ago
|
|
Yeah, this right here would kill it for me: > Strings: Codon currently uses ASCII strings unlike Python's unicode strings. That rules out almost anything web-ish for me. The use case I could imagine is places where you have a bunch of python programmers who don't really want to learn another language but you have modest amounts of very speed-sensitive work. E.g., you're a financial trading company who has hired a lot of PhDs with data science experience. In that context, I could imagine saying, "Ok, quants, all of your production code has to work in Codon". It's not like they're programming masters anyhow, and having it be pretty Python-ish will be good enough for them. |
|
Yikes. These days I wouldn't even call those strings, just bytes. I can live with static/strong typing (I prefer it, even), but not having support for actual strings is a huge blow.