Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by paperplatter 638 days ago
If they want to be for-profit because that's how they get the investment to build GPT-4, fine, do it from the start. That doesn't justify the switch.
2 comments

It certainly would've been better, but they made OpenAI years before even GPT-1. They didn't realize how much money they'd need to scale the model or how insufficient donations would be.

I think the world is much better off with them having switched the structure vs. throwing their hands in the air and giving up because they were stuck as a non-profit forever.

There was no "switch". It's a parent non-profit owning the for profit corporation.

The for profit part is fine, but how is the non-profit currently fulfilling any of its mission?