|
|
|
|
|
by bigiain
641 days ago
|
|
What an awesome way of finding companies who suspect their code is insecure, and then having them give you their source code. And _charging_ them for it, presumably to make it an easier sell to CXOs: 'Nah, it's not those free software hippy communists, they're gonna make you pay through the nose for this, like a _proper_ compliance checkbox ticking outsourced vendor!" I wonder if this is an NSA front? Or Palintir maybe? Or NSO? |
|
There are some free tools out there but most do lag behind the industry as a whole by quite a bit. There's also lots of abandoned free tools out there cluttering up the space. Plenty started with good intentions that now give a false sense of security. There's also lots of snake oil in the paid space. Doing one's homework really helps here and you'd be surprised how many tools fail miserably during a simple proof of concept test, which is probably why more and more vendors try to avoid them.