|
|
|
|
|
by asadeddin
637 days ago
|
|
Unfortunately, I realized the sentence reads weirdly. It's meant to say we use hundreds of repositories: close-source projects we own + open-source projects that are vulnerable by design + open source projects. I've updated the language in the post. It's very true. SAST is really enterprise security dork code for "security linter"! I might start using that with some of our developer facing content. We launched a recent project that combines LLMs + Static code analysis to detect more sophisticated business and code logic findings to get more real stuff. We wanted to follow the industry a bit more to create familiarity but a differentiation too in this type and we called it BLAST (Business Logic Application Security Testing). |
|